4.5 Modes of training delivery
The final key input is modes of training delivery. VET systems usually distinguish between:
A threefold distinction is also drawn between:
Formal and non-formal VET can be delivered in different modes. These delivery modes can be grouped and distinguished according to the following criteria:
Within these criteria, delivery arrangements may again differ. The following illustration provides an overview:
Criterion
Arrangements ranging from
…
to
fragmentation
stand-alone modules
module sequence (allowing exit and re-entry)
comprehensive programme
practical exposure
classroom and laboratory focus
simulation (workshop etc.), 'teaching factory'
learning at work (experiential learning)
distance learning
online emphasis
blended learning (online courses plus contact seminars)
offline emphasis
outreach
fixed location
'hub' and satellite centres
mobile units
customisation
individuals select units
pre-defined content plus optional units
pre-defined content
learning progress
Learning duration is flexible, outcomes fixed
('competency-based')
Learning duration is fixed; content can be added (for fast learners)
Outcomes are variable (grading); duration is fixed
timing
full-time
mixed (e.g. full-time at weekends)
part-time
Which delivery mode with what kind of arrangement is chosen depends on the overall VET approach and policy of a country but also on the given circumstances of individual training providers and of the target groups they serve. Often, training providers offer different modes and combinations in order to be able to respond flexibly to different target groups and to optimise the use of their training infrastructure.
All these delivery modes have advantages and drawbacks, and each VET system has to develop its own specific mix according to national priorities, culture, and available capacities.
Consider these key analytical questions for modes of delivery: