You might be of the opinion that working on governance is not a goal of development cooperation, or if it is, it is basically a
means to an end. We believe that development challenges are governance challenges! Please also look at the introductory reading
>>!<<What is governance for SDC?>>!<<.
Not yet convinced? Here a further argument why governance is not just a means to an end, but a development goal in itself: By adopting the SDGs and in particular
Goal 16 on “Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions”, all countries have acknowledged governance as a part and parcel of development cooperation, and as a goal in itself. (For us, of course, this was clear even before the adoption of the SDGs 😊).
We make a – sometimes overlapping – distinction between two kinds of governance support:
So, development challenges are governance challenges! And now … You might ask: How do we position ourselves within this wide range of governance challenges and why? Additionally to ensuring local ownership, our approach is simple:
- Always work on governance as a transversal theme
Work on those governance priorities that are relevant to the context and where Switzerland has a proven expertise
We are convinced that any kind of development intervention, be it in education, water, health, climate change or else, needs to look at the institutions active in the sector, the quality of the processes that lead to the rules and regulations in this sector and also at the powers and interests of different actors. Please read this two-pager to get an initial understanding of the term >>!<<‘transversal governance’>>!<<. And dive deeper into the topic with this longer
guidance paper with examples from the water and
health sectors. Or listen to network members on how they have implemented transversal governance in their offices:
Here, we propose to work on the four >>!<<pillars>>!<< as defined in our
Governance guidance: (1) democratic governance, participation & accountability (2) decentralisation and multi-level governance (3) combatting corruption and (4) governance opportunities, challenges from digitalisation. The fifth is transversal governance (see above). Switzerland focuses on these four pillars, as it has either a particular (Swiss) advantage or long-standing knowledge. Each of those pillars is broad in itself and has sub-topics. Throughout the years, the Governance
Team has developed specific guidances on these sub-topics to which you find the following links. Additionally, we provide you with videos to either illustrate sub-topics with project examples or explanatory vidoes.
A. Promoting democratic governance, participation and accountability Interested in a short example of how we support parliaments or how we include participation in projects? Please see here the video on the parliamentary support project in Macedonia and women’s empowerment in the constitution making process in Nepal:
In this video, which is part of the overall media support guide, you are introduced to the challenges of new technologies and media support:
B. Supporting decentralisation and well-functioning multi-level governance
Here you can find two videos that introduce you to two long-standing decentralisation projects, one in Albania and the other one in Ukraine.
C. Combating corruption on all levels
If you work on activities in this area and want some SDC specific inputs, look at our new
Anti-corruption guidance. This video below introduces you to the challenges of corruption and media:
If you have a free evening and are interested in anti-corruption, we recommend you to watch the film Bahasha by Jordan Riber from Tanzania [see trailer here above] that was supported by Switzerland. It won the price for the best African Language Movie of the Africa Movie Academy Award in 2018. Currently the movie is being streamed on Netflix.
D. Responding to governance opportunities and challenges from digitalisation
Look at the policy note on what we define as
key issues in digital governance; review this
mapping of possible partners and look into this short note on how you can
assess proposals for digital governance programs; watch the following video from an example of an e-governance project in Ukraine and a video on how we think digitalisation is affecting good governance.
The question is, how do you decide to work on certain priorities? In this video, Dani Radu from the Moldova Office tells you how their governance (with a big G) portfolio looks like and why they have decided to work on these issues.
Before we go into the detail on what we do when analysing governance with our partners, we have to be so frank to tell you about our assumptions (if you disagree with us on these, we would love to hear from you 😊). Namely, we assume that governance processes lead to good development outcomes when:
public officials are well trained, have integrity, and are regularly paid;
public officials' activities are transparent; people can hold public officials accountable; all concerned people are included in a public decision-making process (what we call multi-stakeholder approach), otherwise a decision is likely not to hold in the long run; rules and regulations are known, and can be referred to; people trust public officials that they apply these rules and regulations to everyone in the same way.
This is why we always support these qualities in people and processes when we work on governance.
Governance is cool 😊 and we can and should always work on it – either in sectors (climate change, health, water, education, private sector development) or also on governance priorities, as we call it, like public planning, financing, information, communication, and political processes.
Where to go next -->
|