Page Content
Events
2020-09 Gender Learning Day Find a complete reporting on this conference on the right side (Reporting - Gender Learning Day 2020). The ongoing COVID19 pandemic has highlighted the indispensable contributions of women’s leadership on the frontlines be it as policymakers, homemakers, caretakers, business owners or health and other essential service providers. At the global level, prior to the crisis, international studies reported an increase in inequality, fragility and declining civic space. Where democracy is in decline, we can observe the emergence of authoritarianism, conservatism, patriarchy, and radicalization, with particularly negative impacts on women, and other marginalized groups. This is evidenced by the increase in different forms of violence against these groups, and a regression in Women’s Economic Empowerment (WEE) and an especially persistent and significant global gender gap in Women’s Political Empowerment (WPE). While there is increasing data and evidence supporting the business case for Women’s Economic Empowerment, insights and analysis related to the case of Women’s Political Empowerment remain limited. What research and practice indicate so far is that when women are better represented, decisions taken tend to benefit a broader spectrum of society, contributing to more inclusion, cohesion, equity and security. However, what is women’s political leadership, what types of leadership exist, for example in national/subnational, formal/informal political ‘institutions’ (i.a. the executive power, parliaments, committees, political parties, political movements or campaigns, informal political leadership positions), as well as in spaces of political deliberation, bargaining and decision-making. In addition and importantly, what are the framework conditions and other decisive factors, which most enable women’s leadership role? What motivates or encourages women to assume, exercise political leadership, and what incentivizes political ‘institutions’ to accommodate, promote female leaders? SDC wishes to explore these questions further, and in doing so contribute to bridging the information gap related to better understanding and therefore better addressing Women’s Political Leadership in the different contexts and programs it and its implementing partners operate in globally.
Find a complete reporting on this conference on the right side (Reporting - Gender Learning Day 2020). The ongoing COVID19 pandemic has highlighted the indispensable contributions of women’s leadership on the frontlines be it as policymakers, homemakers, caretakers, business owners or health and other essential service providers. At the global level, prior to the crisis, international studies reported an increase in inequality, fragility and declining civic space. Where democracy is in decline, we can observe the emergence of authoritarianism, conservatism, patriarchy, and radicalization, with particularly negative impacts on women, and other marginalized groups. This is evidenced by the increase in different forms of violence against these groups, and a regression in Women’s Economic Empowerment (WEE) and an especially persistent and significant global gender gap in Women’s Political Empowerment (WPE). While there is increasing data and evidence supporting the business case for Women’s Economic Empowerment, insights and analysis related to the case of Women’s Political Empowerment remain limited. What research and practice indicate so far is that when women are better represented, decisions taken tend to benefit a broader spectrum of society, contributing to more inclusion, cohesion, equity and security. However, what is women’s political leadership, what types of leadership exist, for example in national/subnational, formal/informal political ‘institutions’ (i.a. the executive power, parliaments, committees, political parties, political movements or campaigns, informal political leadership positions), as well as in spaces of political deliberation, bargaining and decision-making. In addition and importantly, what are the framework conditions and other decisive factors, which most enable women’s leadership role? What motivates or encourages women to assume, exercise political leadership, and what incentivizes political ‘institutions’ to accommodate, promote female leaders? SDC wishes to explore these questions further, and in doing so contribute to bridging the information gap related to better understanding and therefore better addressing Women’s Political Leadership in the different contexts and programs it and its implementing partners operate in globally.
Pictures - 2020-09 Gender Learning Day
SDC [103 kB]
Criteria for scoring principal: Gender equality is the main objective of the project and the project would not have been undertaken without this gender equality objective.
SDC [103 kB]
Criteria for scoring significant : Gender equality is an important and deliberate objective, but not the principal reason for undertaking the project.
SDC [97 kB]
Although the DAC does not use the Gender Policy Marker for multilateral contributions, SDC also applies the marker to
core contributions to multilateral organisations and institutional partners to guarantee quality assurance and the tracking of all resources.
|
​​​ Relevant Links
​​​ Relevant Links
​​​ Folders
|